<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<rss version='2.0'>
<channel>
<title>lawindexpro - Litigation Practice Case Law Update</title>
<pubdate>20 March 2012</pubdate>
<lastbuilddate>20 March 2012</lastbuilddate>
<language>en-us</language>
<managingEditor>dswarb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>dswarb@gmail.com</webMaster>
<description>Case law database England, Scotland, Nothern Ireland, Europe</description>
<link>http://lawindexpro.co.uk</link>

<item>
	<title>Faidi and Another -v- Elliot Corporation</title>
	<description>16-Mar-12 - CA - Tenants appealed against a refusal of of the ourt to make an order requiring the landlord to enforce a covenant as  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=452147</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=452147</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Patel -v- Unite The Union</title>
	<description>27-Jan-12 - QBD - The claimant, wanting to bring defamation proceedings in respect of postings on the defendant's internet forum, sought  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450509</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450509</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Ferdinand -v- MGN Limited</title>
	<description>29-Sep-11 - QBD - The claimant, a famous footballer, complained that an article by the defendant relating an affair he had had, had  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444825</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444825</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Austin and Others -v- Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd</title>
	<description>29-Jul-11 - CA - The claimants appealed against refusal of a Group Litigation Order GLO . Over 500 parties wished to claim in nuisance  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=442415</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=442415</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>FandC Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd. -v- Barthelemy and Another</title>
	<description>14-Jul-11 - ChD - The parties applied to the court for a conclusion to their action without the draft judgment being handed down and  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441823</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441823</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Al Rawi and Others -v- The Security Service and Others</title>
	<description>13-Jul-11 - SC - The claimant pursued a civil claim for damages, alleging complicity of the respondent in his torture whilst in the  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441627</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441627</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Cart -v- The Upper Tribunal (Rev 1)</title>
	<description>21-Jun-11 - SC - Three claimants sought to challenge decisions of various Upper Tribunals by way of judicial review. In each case the  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441294</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441294</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Araci -v- Fallon</title>
	<description>04-Jun-11 - CA - The claimant said that the defendant jockey had agreed to ride the claimant's horse in the Epsom Derby to be run on  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=440444</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=440444</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Goodwin -v- News Group Newspapers Ltd</title>
	<description>27-May-11 - QBD - An associated claimant alleged contempt against another newspaper for publishing matters so as to defeat the purposes  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=440245</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=440245</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>CTB -v- News Group Newspapers Ltd and Another (3)</title>
	<description>23-May-11 - QBD - The defendant applied to be released from an injunction protecting the claimant's privacy. It said that the claimant's  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=440195</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=440195</guid>
</item>
 
</channel>
</rss>

