<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<rss version='2.0'>
<channel>
<title>lawindexpro - Landlord and Tenant Case Law Update</title>
<pubdate>16 March 2013</pubdate>
<lastbuilddate>16 March 2013</lastbuilddate>
<language>en-us</language>
<managingEditor>dswarb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>dswarb@gmail.com</webMaster>
<description>Case law database England, Scotland, Nothern Ireland, Europe</description>
<link>http://lawindexpro.co.uk</link>

<item>
	<title>Sims -v- Dacorum Borough Council</title>
	<description>24-Jan-13 - CA - Husband and wife had been joint tenants of the council. On the breakdown of the marriage, W gave notice to quit. H  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=470554</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=470554</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Day and Another -v- Hosebay Ltd</title>
	<description>10-Oct-12 - SC - The Court considered the provisions for leasehold enfranchisement now that the residence requirement had been removed  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=464768</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=464768</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Unique Pub Properties Ltd -v- Broard Green Tavern Ltd and Another</title>
	<description>26-Jul-12 - ChD - The claimant freeholder sought to install in the tenant's pub, equipment to monitor sales. It claimed a right for this  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=463302</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=463302</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council -v- Hickin</title>
	<description>25-Jul-12 - SC - The claimant's parents were secure joint tenants. After her father left, the mother later died. The respondent served a  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=463146</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=463146</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>South Tyneside Council -v- Ciarlo and Another</title>
	<description>25-Jul-12 - UTLC - LANDLORD AND TENANT  management charges being part of the service charges  local authority landlord employing arm's  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=463435</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=463435</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd -v- Associated British Ports</title>
	<description>10-May-12 - CA - The tenant appealed against a finding that the landlord was entitled to resist renewal of its lease under the 1954 Act  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=457603</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=457603</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Magnohard Ltd -v- Cadogan and Another</title>
	<description>04-May-12 - CA - The parties disputed whether a building was a house 'reasonably so called' within the 1987 Act. The instant building  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=456513</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=456513</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Country Trade Limited -v- Hanton and Others</title>
	<description>03-May-12 - UTLC - LANDLORD AND TENANT- service charges  Landlord and Tenant Act 1985  reasonableness of service charge  fair hearing   . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=460255</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=460255</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>OM Property Management Ltd Re: 36 Culpepper Close</title>
	<description>03-May-12 - UTLC - LANDLORD AND TENANT- service charges  Landlord and Tenant Act 1985  treatment of in-house solicitor's legal costs  to  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=460259</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=460259</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Faidi and Another -v- Elliot Corporation</title>
	<description>16-Mar-12 - CA - Tenants appealed against a refusal of of the ourt to make an order requiring the landlord to enforce a covenant as  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=452147</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=452147</guid>
</item>
 
</channel>
</rss>
