<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<rss version='2.0'>
<channel>
<title>lawindexpro - Land Case Law Update</title>
<pubdate>20 March 2012</pubdate>
<lastbuilddate>20 March 2012</lastbuilddate>
<language>en-us</language>
<managingEditor>dswarb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>dswarb@gmail.com</webMaster>
<description>Case law database England, Scotland, Nothern Ireland, Europe</description>
<link>http://lawindexpro.co.uk</link>

<item>
	<title>Cook -v- The Mortgage Business Plc</title>
	<description>24-Jan-12 - CA - The land owners sought relief from possession orders made under mortgages given in equity release schemes: "If the  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450464</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450464</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Chambers -v- London Borough of Havering</title>
	<description>20-Dec-11 - CA - The defendant appealed against an order for him to surrender possession of land he had claimed by adverse possession.  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450103</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450103</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Dixon and Another -v- Hodgson and Others</title>
	<description>20-Dec-11 - CA - The parties were in a boundary dispute. The court warned of the danger of deciding where a boundary is by simply  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450105</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450105</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Hardy and Another -v- Haselden and Others</title>
	<description>29-Nov-11 - CA - The claimants had taken up occupation of a farm under an informal arrangement which they now said amounted to a tenancy  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=449033</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=449033</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Sharma and Another -v- Simposh Ltd</title>
	<description>23-Nov-11 - CA - The parties created an oral and therefore void contract for a development, the claimants paid a deposit, expressed to  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=448491</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=448491</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Zarb and Another -v- Parry and Another</title>
	<description>15-Nov-11 - CA - The parties disputed the position of the boundary between their neighbouring properties. The appellant Z had succeeded  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=448324</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=448324</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Egan -v- Basildon Borough Council</title>
	<description>26-Sep-11 - QBD - The claimant sought a injunction to restrain the defendant council from executing enforcement notices regarding the use  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444871</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444871</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Cleaver and Others -v- Schyde Investments Ltd</title>
	<description>29-Jul-11 - CA - The parties had contracted for the sale of land. The purchaser secured the rescinding of the contract for innocent  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=443231</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=443231</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Swift 1st Ltd -v- Colin and Others</title>
	<description>27-Jul-11 - ChD - The parties disputed the effects of charges over a property. A charge had not been registered, but merely noted on the  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444780</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444780</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Jones and Another -v- Ruth and Another</title>
	<description>12-Jul-11 - CA - The parties were neighbours. The claimants succeeded in their assertion of trespass and nuisance in building works  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441586</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441586</guid>
</item>
 
</channel>
</rss>

