<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<rss version='2.0'>
<channel>
<title>lawindexpro - Information Case Law Update</title>
<pubdate>05 August 2010</pubdate>
<lastbuilddate>05 August 2010</lastbuilddate>
<language>en-us</language>
<managingEditor>ds@lawindexpro.co.uk</managingEditor>
<webMaster>ds@lawindexpro.co.uk</webMaster>
<description>Case law database England, Scotland, Nothern Ireland, Europe</description>
<link>http://lawindexpro.co.uk</link>

<item>
	<title>Tchenguiz and Others -v- Imerman</title>
	<description>29-Jul-10 - CA - Anticipating a refusal by H to disclose assets in ancillary relief proceedings, W's brothers wrongfully accessed H's  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=421118</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=421118</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Sugar -v- The British Broadcasting Commission and Another (No 2)</title>
	<description>23-Jun-10 - CA - The respondent had had prepared a report as to the balance of its reporting of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=417715</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=417715</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>London Borough of Lewisham -v- D and Others</title>
	<description>29-Mar-10 - FD - The local authority was investigating allegations involving the family history of children in their care. They sought  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=417776</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=417776</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Kennedy -v- Information Commissioner</title>
	<description>19-Jan-10 - Admn - The claimant journalist had made a freedom of information request to the Charity Commission as to its investigations of  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=402727</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=402727</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Sectorguard Plc v Dienne Plc</title>
	<description>03-Nov-09 - ChD - The claimant alleged misuse of confidential information in the form of its customer list, and its charges to them. The  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=377355</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=377355</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>L, Regina (On the Application of) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis</title>
	<description>29-Oct-09 - SC - The Court was asked as to the practice of supplying enhanced criminal record certificates under the 1997 Act. It was  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=377319</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=377319</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Chief Constable of Humberside Police and Others v The Information Commissioner and Another</title>
	<description>19-Oct-09 - CA - Complaints had been made that the police were not deleting from their criminal records very old records of minor  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=376166</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=376166</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>McGuffick v The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc</title>
	<description>06-Oct-09 - ComC - The claimant challenged the validity of a loan agreement with his bank as a regulated consumer credit agreement. After  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=375741</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=375741</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Imerman -v- Tchenguiz and Others</title>
	<description>27-Jul-09 - QBD - It was said that the defendant had taken private and confidential material from the claimant's computer. The claimant  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=368659</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=368659</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>HM Treasury -v- The Information Commissioner</title>
	<description>21-Jul-09 - Admn - The interested party sought to obtain the legal opinion on which the Prime Minister had based his assertion that the  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=349093</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=349093</guid>
</item>
 
</channel>
</rss>
