<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<rss version='2.0'>
<channel>
<title>lawindexpro - Human Rights Case Law Update</title>
<pubdate>23 January 2012</pubdate>
<lastbuilddate>23 January 2012</lastbuilddate>
<language>en-us</language>
<managingEditor>dswarb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>dswarb@gmail.com</webMaster>
<description>Case law database England, Scotland, Nothern Ireland, Europe</description>
<link>http://lawindexpro.co.uk</link>

<item>
	<title>Fitzpatrick and Others -v- The Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis</title>
	<description>11-Jan-12 - QBD - The claimants, two silictors and their employer firm sought damages alleging trespass and malicious procurement by  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450312</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450312</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Mousa, Regina (on The Application of) -v- Secretary of State for Defence and Another</title>
	<description>22-Nov-11 - CA - The claimant sought a public inquiry into allegations of systematic ill treatment by UK soldiers in Iraq. He now  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=448408</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=448408</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Axa General Insurance Ltd and Others -v- Lord Advocate and Others</title>
	<description>12-Oct-11 - SC - The appellants had written employers' liability insurance policies. They appealed against rejection of their challenge  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=445395</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=445395</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Her Majesty's Advocate -v- P</title>
	<description>06-Oct-11 - SC -  Scotland The appellant had been interviewed by police without being offered access to a solicitor. He complained that  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444963</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444963</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Ferdinand -v- MGN Limited</title>
	<description>29-Sep-11 - QBD - The claimant, a famous footballer, complained that an article by the defendant relating an affair he had had, had  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444825</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444825</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Castle and Others -v- Commissioner of Police for The Metropolis</title>
	<description>08-Sep-11 - Admn - The claimants, all under 17 years old, took a peaceful part in a substantial but disorderly demonstration in London.  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=443762</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=443762</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Stewart -v- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions</title>
	<description>29-Jul-11 - CA - The court considered the arrangements for providing public support for the costs of funerals. The claimant's son had  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=442416</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=442416</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>E-A (Article 8 - Best Interests of Child) Nigeria</title>
	<description>22-Jul-11 - UTIAC -  i The correct starting point in considering the welfare and best interests of a young child would be that it is in  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444045</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444045</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Revenue and Customs -v- Jones and Another</title>
	<description>18-Jul-11 - CA - HMRC appealed against an order for the return to the owner of goods seized under the 1979 Act. The respondents imported  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441888</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441888</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>A and Another -v- P and Others</title>
	<description>08-Jul-11 - FD - M applied for a parental order under the 2008 Act. The child had been born through a surrogacy arrangement in India,  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441892</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=441892</guid>
</item>
 
</channel>
</rss>

