<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<rss version='2.0'>
<channel>
<title>lawindexpro - Family Case Law Update</title>
<pubdate>17 May 2013</pubdate>
<lastbuilddate>17 May 2013</lastbuilddate>
<language>en-us</language>
<managingEditor>dswarb@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>dswarb@gmail.com</webMaster>
<description>Case law database England, Scotland, Nothern Ireland, Europe</description>
<link>http://lawindexpro.co.uk</link>

<item>
	<title>Ageyevy -v- Russia</title>
	<description>18-Apr-13 - ECHR - Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for private life Failure adequately to investigate unauthorised  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=509281</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=509281</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>RS (Immigration/Family Court Liaison: Outcome) India</title>
	<description>26-Feb-13 - UTIAC -  1  This case provides an example of the importance of co-operation and communication between the two jurisdictions,  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=472146</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=472146</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Nimako-Boateng (Residence Orders - Anton Considered) Ghana</title>
	<description>04-Jul-12 - UTIAC - A residence order or prohibited steps order made by a judge of the family court under s.8 of the Children Act 1998 do  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=461940</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=461940</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>RS (Immigration and Family Court Proceedings) India</title>
	<description>04-Jul-12 - UTIAC - 1. Where a claimant appeals against a decision to deport or remove and there are outstanding family proceedings  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=461941</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=461941</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>BH and Another -v- The Lord Advocate and Another</title>
	<description>20-Jun-12 - SC - The appellants wished to resist their extradition to the US to face criminal charges for drugs. As a married couple  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=460538</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=460538</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Gow -v- Grant</title>
	<description>24-May-12 - SC - The parties had lived together as an unmarried couple, but separated. Mrs Gow applied under the 2006 Act for  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=462499</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=462499</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>NLW -v- ARC</title>
	<description>13-Jan-12 - FD - The former wife sought leave to appeal against an ancillary relief order made by consent. The husband did not attend.  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450567</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=450567</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>S -v- AG (Financial Remedy: Lottery Prize)</title>
	<description>14-Oct-11 - FD - The court considered how to treat a lottery win of &#163;500,000 in the context of an ancillary relief application on a  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=445469</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=445469</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council -v- Watson</title>
	<description>01-Sep-11 - FD - The defendant applied to be allowed to purge her contempt of court. Held: The court first pointed out that the  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444732</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=444732</guid>
</item>
 

<item>
	<title>Erhire -v- E O-I (by his next friend)</title>
	<description>24-Mar-11 - CA - The mother appealed against a sentence of eight months imprisonment imposed for contempt of court in having broken an  . . .</description>
	<link>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=439814</link>
	<guid>http://www.lawindexpro.co.uk/cgi-bin/pubcited.pl?idx=439814</guid>
</item>
 
</channel>
</rss>
